real content
The presentation itself
went very well, though I seem to recall that it was rather sparsely
attended. I also recall how surprised I was to discover during the
question and answer period that almost everyone who asked a question
said something like: "That was very interesting. I was wondering
whether, in the light of your father's research, he's also considered
...", after which came a mention of a totally tangential or unrelated
idea or theory. It took me a while to realize that these questioners
probably hadn't had their papers accepted for presentation, and thus
used the question and answer periods for plugging their own work.
When, at a distance of over twenty years, I again reviewed the placard
I'd prepared I found it quite self-explanatory, and logical. But I,
of course, have been familiar with my father's research for many years.
I don't know whether someone else, without my background, might make
sense of it. I was thus quite pleased when, going through my parents'
papers recently, I found the abstract of Dad's presentation for that
conference. Though the abstract perhaps inundates the reader with
a lengthy series of perceptions and inter-perception that can be hard
to follow, the basic point becomes very clear - family therapy isn't
a one-on-one discussion session, but an attempt to identify sources
of family conflict in the ways in which family members don't meet
the expectations of others. Once these foci of discord have been identified,
the therapist can attempt to change the expectations, or the behaviors
that lead to conflict.
But today I'm perhaps more interested in the fact that an interesting
and involving presentation could be made simply because it had a good
and engaging text, and a simple yet effective prop. In today's world
of segues and fade-outs and flashy backgrounds, content often seems
to take a back seat. (Either that, or the entire lecture gets printed
on the PowerPoint slides and the audience is compelled not only to
listen to a boring presentation, but to try and read along with the
small print on the screen at the same time.) Nostalgia is often the
almost inevitable result of finding something stashed away in the
attic. But though I don't feel nostalgic toward pre-computer times,
I certainly wouldn't mind if presentations at conferences took their
cue from how it was done (well) back then.
|