|
all of me
Putting the last piece of a puzzle into place has something of the
ritual about it. Programmers who build puzzles for computers realize
this and set the puzzle to flash a couple of times when the last
piece if successfully put into place. Even when we know that it's
the last piece, even when well before then the whole picture is
clear to us, that last piece creates a feeling of achievement ...
and of wholeness.
But what are we to do
when we no longer have that last piece? What do we do with a puzzle
that can never again reach that wholeness? (Who would want us to
pass it on to him or her?) Sure, we can still put the puzzle together
until that last piece, but something is always going to be
missing, a feeling of incompleteness, of perhaps emptiness, remains.
For obvious reasons I can't scan the missing pieces of a puzzle.
But even when another piece is missing, can we perhaps feel the
incompleteness on the other pieces? Does the fact that the puzzle
can never be whole again radiate from each piece that remains? Above
are two pieces from different puzzles. One piece from one of the
puzzles seems to have been irretrievably lost. Does it show? Can
the piece from the complete puzzle be identified?
Sometimes the history of a particular toy is lost well before it even
gets to us. A wooden puzzle for learning the numbers (that Hila seemed
to enjoy though I could never figure out what attracted her to it)
arrived by us already missing a piece. From the start it was a strange
puzzle - the picture pieces were each the same size, as were the numerals,
meaning that it was possible to put the puzzle together without getting
the numbers right. Maybe that was the reason the kids seemed to enjoy
playing with it. Now that it's ready to be passed on to someone else
it seems to be in need of a couple of other pieces which have become
misplaced. |